Transition of weather regimes is examined in a highly simplified model
. Two completely distinct internal methods of transition are identifie
d. The first is a synoptically triggered large-scale instability, whil
e the second is an energy inconsistency between the large-scale and sy
noptic scales that does not allow the two scales to equilibrate. In th
e atmosphere, the first case appears as a sudden propagation and dampi
ng (or vice versa) of the large-scale pattern with no obvious warning,
while the second is consistent with the synoptician's description of
a regime being disrupted by a single catastrophic event such as explos
ive cyclogenesis. The first method is always fast (on a synoptic time
scale), while the second does not have to be, though often is. By exam
ining what causes the regimes to fail, one can better understand the r
ole of the transients during all phases of weather regimes.