M. Mikulincer et al., ATTACHMENT STYLES, COPING STRATEGIES, AND POSTTRAUMATIC PSYCHOLOGICALDISTRESS - THE IMPACT OF THE GULF-WAR IN ISRAEL, Journal of personality and social psychology, 64(5), 1993, pp. 817-826
This study examines the association between adult attachment style and
the way people reacted to the Iraqi missile attack on Israel during t
he Gulf War. One hundred forty Israeli students were interviewed 2 wee
ks after the war and classified according to their attachment style (s
ecure, avoidant, or ambivalent) and residence area (dangerous vs. less
dangerous). Ambivalent people reported more distress than secure peop
le. Avoidant persons reported higher levels of somatization, hostility
, and trauma-related avoidance than secure persons. These results char
acterized Ss living in dangerous areas. In addition, secure people use
d relatively more support-seeking strategies in coping with the trauma
, ambivalent people used more emotion-focused strategies, and avoidant
people used more distancing strategies. Findings are discussed in ter
ms of attachment working models.