MECHANORECEPTORS AROUND THE TOOTH EVOKE INHIBITORY AND EXCITATORY REFLEXES IN THE HUMAN MASSETER MUSCLE

Citation
P. Brodin et al., MECHANORECEPTORS AROUND THE TOOTH EVOKE INHIBITORY AND EXCITATORY REFLEXES IN THE HUMAN MASSETER MUSCLE, Journal of physiology, 464, 1993, pp. 711-723
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Physiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00223751
Volume
464
Year of publication
1993
Pages
711 - 723
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3751(1993)464:<711:MATTEI>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
1. The reflex responses evoked in the human masseter muscle by control led mechanical stimulation of an incisor tooth were examined electromy ographically. The stimuli were (slow) pushes and (brisk) taps of about 0-5-3 N peak force, applied orthogonally to the labial surface. 2. Th e brisk taps elicited a short-latency inhibitory reflex that was often followed by an excitatory peak, as has been described earlier. The in hibition increased as the taps became stronger. 3. Slow pushes evoked a long-latency, primarily excitatory response. The excitation increase d with stronger, faster rise-time pushes; however, with the stronger s timuli, the short-latency inhibitory response often became evident bef ore the onset of the excitation. 4. The reflex responses to 3 N pushes and 2 N taps were abolished when the receptors around the tooth were blocked with local anaesthetic, indicating that the response was elici ted from receptors located within the periodontal area. 5. Prolonged, rapid-onset displacements evoked a complex reflex response that combin ed the characteristics of the taps and the pushes. 6. The most likely explanation for the different responses evoked by the pushes and taps is that the patterns of afferent activity elicited by the slow and fas t tooth displacements activated different interneuronal pathways to mo toneurones. 7. The inhibitory response to taps is essentially a protec tive reflex which probably serves to reduce the activity of the jaw-cl osing muscles when one bites unexpectedly on hard objects. It is sugge sted that the excitatory response may contribute to the muscle activit y required to hold food between the teeth during chewing, or may act a s a load compensation reflex to control chewing force.