INTERMEDIATE IONIZATION CONTINUA FOR DOUBLE CHARGE-EXCHANGE AT HIGH-IMPACT ENERGIES

Authors
Citation
D. Belkic, INTERMEDIATE IONIZATION CONTINUA FOR DOUBLE CHARGE-EXCHANGE AT HIGH-IMPACT ENERGIES, Physical review. A, 47(5), 1993, pp. 3824-3844
Citations number
80
Categorie Soggetti
Physics
Journal title
ISSN journal
10502947
Volume
47
Issue
5
Year of publication
1993
Part
A
Pages
3824 - 3844
Database
ISI
SICI code
1050-2947(1993)47:5<3824:IICFDC>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
We investigate the problem of two-electron capture from heliumlike ato mic systems by bare nuclei Z(p)+(Z(T);e1,e2)i-->(Z(p);e1,e2)f+Z(T) at high incident energies, using the four-body formalism of the first- an d second-order theories. Our goal is to establish the relative importa nce of the intermediate ionization continua of the two electrons in co mparison with the usual direct path of the double electron transfer. F or this purpose we presently introduce the boundary-corrected continuu m-intermediate-state (BCIS) approximation, which preserves all the fea tures of two-electron capture as a genuine four-body problem. The prop osed second-order theory provides a fully adequate description of the fact that, in an intermediate stage of collision, both electrons move in the field of the two Coulomb centers. The previously devised bounda ry-corrected first Born (CB1) approximation can be obtained as a furth er simplification of the BCIS model if the invoked two-electron Coulom b waves are replaced by their long-range logarithmic phase factors def ined in terms of the corresponding interaggregate separation R. The BC IS method is implemented on the symmetric resonant double charge excha nge in collisions between alpha particles and He(1s2) at impact energi es E greater-than-or-equal-to 900 keV. The obtained results for the di fferential and total cross sections are compared with the available ex perimental data and satisfactory agreement is recorded. As the inciden t energy increases, a dramatic improvement is obtained in going from t he CB1 to the BCIS approximation, since the latter closely follows the measurement, whereas the former overestimates the observed total cros s sections by two orders of magnitude.