The goal of calibration is to estimate a sample's concentration and th
e error associated with that estimate when only its signal response is
known. Simulations were run to test the accuracy and precision of var
ious parametric confidence intervals to confidence intervals generated
by the bias-corrected, nonparametric bootstrap approach. None of the
methods studied reached their asymptotic coverage probability, althoug
h the exact parametric confidence interval came the closest. The range
s of exact parametric confidence intervals were significantly larger t
han the other methods. Approximate parametric confidence intervals and
bootstrap confidence intervals were both dependent on the number of r
eplicates analyzed and on the coefficient of variation of the assay. W
hen only a single replicate was available for analysis, the bootstrap
method was dismal in containing the true sample concentration. As the
number of replicates increases, the width of the bootstrap confidence
interval converged to the exact parametric confidence interval, wherea
s the approximate parametric confidence interval width increased and b
egan to diverge from the exact parametric confidence interval. Bootstr
ap confidence intervals produce maximal coverage with minimal range wh
en 2-4 replicate samples are available for analysis.