LITHOLOGIC CONTROLS ON MORPHOLOGY OF PRESSURE-DISSOLUTION SURFACES (STYLOLITES AND DISSOLUTION SEAMS) IN PALEOZOIC CARBONATE ROCKS FROM THEMIDEASTERN UNITED-STATES
Lb. Railsback, LITHOLOGIC CONTROLS ON MORPHOLOGY OF PRESSURE-DISSOLUTION SURFACES (STYLOLITES AND DISSOLUTION SEAMS) IN PALEOZOIC CARBONATE ROCKS FROM THEMIDEASTERN UNITED-STATES, Journal of sedimentary petrology, 63(3), 1993, pp. 513-522
Examination of pressure-dissolution surfaces (stylolites and dissoluti
on seams) in carbonate rocks from the mideastern U.S. demonstrates tha
t the morphology of these surfaces varies with rock fabric. One can qu
antify the morphology of these pressure-dissolution surfaces using fou
r parameters: thickness T of the insoluble residue defining the surfac
e, amplitude of irregularity I of the surface between vertical offsets
, amplitude of vertical offsets O of the surface, and frequency F of v
ertical offsets along the surface. I and O increase with T, reflecting
progressive development of stylolites, whereas F is proportional to 1
/T, apparently because the physical strength of a stylolite inhibits t
he formation of offsets. Mean values of F, O, and T are greater in gra
instones and packstones than in mudstones and wackestones, and the abu
ndance of dissolution seams relative to that of stylolites decreases t
hrough the lithologic spectrum from mudstones to grainstones. These re
lationships suggest that development of pressure-dissolution surfaces
to form large stylolites depends on the heterogeneity of the limestone
fabric. Maximum values of T and 0 in grainstones correlate with cemen
t abundance. T and O are low in grain-rich, cement-poor grainstones, e
ven though grains are favored as leading or penetrating elements of st
ylolite columns. Dissolution seams (surfaces with O and F near zero) a
re found only in rocks containing fine-grained dolomite. T and I of th
ose seams decrease with increasing dolomite abundance in dolomitic lim
estones, and T and O are lower in dolostones than in limestones. Taken
together, these relationships suggest that extreme abundance of press
ure-resistant components, such as carbonate grains and dolomite, inhib
it development of pressure-dissolution surfaces. In contrast, stylolit
es are most extensively developed (i.e., T, O, and F are greatest) in
carbonate rocks in which these pressure-resistant elements are mixed w
ith less resistant components, such as cement and carbonate mud. The l
atter rocks, which include packstones, well cemented grainstones, and
slightly dolomitic limestones, may undergo preferential removal from t
he stratigraphic record by pressure dissolution.