R. Volpes et al., INTEGRINS AS DIFFERENTIAL CELL LINEAGE MARKERS OF PRIMARY LIVER-TUMORS, The American journal of pathology, 142(5), 1993, pp. 1483-1492
This study analyzed new cell lineage markers for the differential diag
nosis between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (C
hC), as well as the potential pathways of cell-cell and cell-extracell
ular matrix interactions of neoplastic liver cells during tumor spread
and invasion, by comparing the expression of (VLA) integrins, vitrone
ctin receptor, and neural cell adhesion molecule in normal, inflamed,
and neoplastic human liver biopsies. All cases of liver cell adenoma a
nd well-differentiated HCC expressed the same set of integrins as obse
rved in normal liver tissue, i.e., VLA-alpha1 and VLA-beta1. Poorly di
fferentiated HCC also expressed VLA-alpha1 and VLA-beta1, but in addit
ion de-novo expressed VLA-alpha2, VLA-alpha3, VLA-alpha6 and vitronect
in receptor. All cases of well-differentiated CbC expressed an identic
al integrin immunoprofile as observed in normal bile duct epithelium,
i.e., VLA-alpha2, VLA-alpha3, VLA-alpha6, VLA-beta4 and vitronectin re
ceptor, whereas poorly differentiated CbC showed a markedly decreased
expression of these integrin subunits. VLA-alpha1 was constantly absen
t from all cases of ChC, wbereas VLA-beta4 was never expressed by HCC
Neural cell adhesion molecule, exclusively expressed by proliferating
reactive bile ductules in cholestatic and regenerating liver, was cons
tantly absent from both malignant neoplasms. In conclusion, the integr
in make up of various liver tumors closely follows that of their norma
l counterparts. Differences in integrin receptor expression vary ''cor
ding to the cellular origin of the tumors and are associated with a po
or differentiation. Our findings suggest that immunohistochemical stai
ning for VLA-alpha1 and VLA-beta4 integrin subunits, which highlight t
he cellular phenotype of the two neoplasms, might be a helpful tool in
the differential diagnosis between HCC and ChC.