This paper examines whether differences in the structure of the board
of directors and equity ownership contribute to the incidence of hosti
le takeovers. Evidence from a sample of completed and abandoned hostil
e takeover attempts that occurred during 1980-1988 indicates that, rel
ative to a control sample, outside directors in hostile targets have l
ower ownership stakes and hold fewer additional outside directorships.
Ownership by blockholders unaffiliated with management raises and tha
t by affiliated blockholders decreases the likelihood of a hostile tak
eover attempt. These results suggest that the board of directors and h
ostile takeovers are substitute mechanisms and that unaffiliated block
holdings and hostile takeovers are complementary mechanisms for corpor
ate control.