This paper examines how excessive concern over current stock price can
motivate managers to use observable investment decisions to manipulat
e the market's inferences about the firm. The result can be overinvest
ment or underinvestment. Shareholders can induce optimal investment ch
oices by structuring managerial compensation to balance both future an
d present stock-price performance. Our analysis suggests that firms wi
th high/persistent informational asymmetries between managers and shar
eholders will tend to favor contracts that focus on long-run stock ret
urns (both current and future) over contracts that focus on near-term
stock returns alone. Our empirical results, as well as other results i
n the literature, are generally consistent with this hypothesis.