Bizjak, Brickley, and Coles (1993) study how asymmetric information af
fects investment decisions when firms use stock-based compensation. A
model is developed where suboptimal investment results from compensati
on plans overemphasizing current stock return. Empirical results show
that companies with higher information asymmetries have CEO compensati
on emphasizing equity ownership relative to salary and bonus incentive
s. Surprisingly, they also show that CEO compensation in firms with hi
gher information asymmetries is more weakly associated with stock perf
ormance than compensation in lower asymmetry firms. In my comments, I
identify concerns about the model, the empirical tests, and the relati
on between the two.