COMPARATIVE VASCULAR AUDIT USING THE POSSUM SCORING SYSTEM

Citation
Gp. Copeland et al., COMPARATIVE VASCULAR AUDIT USING THE POSSUM SCORING SYSTEM, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 75(3), 1993, pp. 175-177
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
ISSN journal
00358843
Volume
75
Issue
3
Year of publication
1993
Pages
175 - 177
Database
ISI
SICI code
0035-8843(1993)75:3<175:CVAUTP>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Comparative audit using overall mortality and morbidity figures can be misleading as they do not take into account variations in surgical pr ocedure and patient fitness. To examine these effects we have compared vascular surgery in two differing hospitals, during a similar 9-month period, using the POSSUM scoring system. In one unit, 255 patients un derwent vascular surgery with an operative mortality of 9.4%, and morb idity of 37.3%. In the other unit, 89 patients underwent vascular proc edures with an operative mortality of 20.2% and morbidity of 47.2%. At first sight there appear to be significant differences in operative o utcome between the two units. However, analysis using the Possum syste m predicts a mortality rate of 10.2% for unit A and 20.2% for unit B ( morbidity rates of 38.4% for unit A and 50.6% for unit B). Receiver op erating curve (ROC) analysis demonstrated no significant difference be tween the two units (see Table III). Possum analysis may be of use in comparative audit.