COMPARISONS OF HEMI-INATTENTION PRODUCED BY UNILATERAL LESIONS OF THEPOSTERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX OR MEDIAL AGRANULAR PREFRONTAL CORTEX IN RATS - NEGLECT, EXTINCTION, AND THE ROLE OF STIMULUS DISTANCE
Vr. King et Jv. Corwin, COMPARISONS OF HEMI-INATTENTION PRODUCED BY UNILATERAL LESIONS OF THEPOSTERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX OR MEDIAL AGRANULAR PREFRONTAL CORTEX IN RATS - NEGLECT, EXTINCTION, AND THE ROLE OF STIMULUS DISTANCE, Behavioural brain research, 54(2), 1993, pp. 117-131
Neglect in human and non-human primates has been demonstrated followin
g unilateral lesions of both posterior parietal and prefrontal areas.
While it has now been well established that a unilateral lesion of the
rodent analog of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, medial agranular cor
tex (AGm), results in neglect, the effects of unilateral damage restri
cted to rodent posterior parietal cortex (PPC) have not been examined
in detail. The current study assessed rats with unilateral lesions of
PPC or AGm on their ability to orient to unilateral and bilateral stim
ulation. Since it has been proposed in both the primate and rodent lit
eratures that frontal areas may be responsible for the perception of n
ear space while parietal areas may be responsible for far space, stimu
li were presented at two different distances. Lesions of PPC and AGm r
esulted in severe neglect relative to control operates, with both PPC
and AGm operates manifesting severe hemi-inattention and allesthesia r
elative to control operates. After behavioral recovery from neglect th
ere was no evidence of extinction to bilateral simultaneous stimulatio
n. While neglect to visual stimuli predominated in unilateral PPC oper
ates, unilateral AGm operates had severe neglect in all modalities. In
addition, while both left and right PPC operates showed contralesiona
l neglect, AGm operates demonstrated the lateralized differences in ne
glect reported in previous studies. All groups demonstrated an approxi
mately equivalent level of neglect to stimuli presented at the two dif
ferent distances, and thus failed to support the suggestion of a perip
ersonal-extrapersonal dichotomy between frontal and parietal areas in
rodents.