Phs. Meijerink et al., GASTRIC CHIEF CELL-SPECIFIC TRANSCRIPTION OF THE PEPSINOGEN-A GENE, European journal of biochemistry, 213(3), 1993, pp. 1283-1296
The molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of pepsinogen A (PG
A) gene expression in mammalian cells are poorly understood. In this p
aper we describe the structural and functional analysis of the pepsino
gen A gene promoter in the pig. By genomic Southern analyses we demons
trate that, in contrast with human PGA genes which are amplified and o
rganized in haplotypes, only a single PGA gene is present per haploid
porcine genome. With the aim of identifying promoter elements mediatin
g the gastric mucosa cell-specific transcription of the PGA gene in pi
g, we isolated a PGA gene from a porcine genomic library. The nucleoti
de sequence of the first exon and 1.7 kb of the upstream DNA region we
re determined and compared with the corresponding regions of the human
PGA gene encoding isozymogen Pg5. In order to study the promoter acti
vity of the PGA gene a functional assay was developed: we succeeded in
obtaining primary monolayer cultures of porcine gastric mucosal chief
cells, suitable for transfection. Fragments of 5'-flanking and noncod
ing first exon sequences of the porcine and human PGA genes were linke
d to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene. The transcripti
onal activity of these hybrid genes was assessed in transient expressi
on assays upon transfection (lipofection) of gastric and nongastric ce
lls. Whereas PGA 5'-flanking sequences showed no promoter activity in
nongastric cell types, the DNA region from -205 to +21 was found to be
sufficient to direct expression of the porcine PGA constructs in a ce
ll-specific manner. Further deletion analysis of the proximal promoter
fragment identified several regions (-205 to -167, -127 to -67 and +2
to +21) acting synergistically in the transcriptional regulation of t
he PGA gene. In contrast, all human PGA-CAT constructs used failed to
show promoter activity in porcine gastric chief cells, indicating spec
ies-specific control of PGA gene expression. In addition, the transcri
ptional activity of the porcine PGA promoter in chief cells from pig w
as completely abolished by in vitro CpG methylation. Footprint analyse
s of the proximal promoter fragment using nuclear extracts from either
porcine gastric mucosal chief cells or liver revealed some notable di
fferences between both extracts, which might reflect the interaction w
ith (a) cell-specific factor(s).