Objective: To study the test-ordering behavior of practicing physician
s regarding ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure and to assess chan
ges in patient management after this study. Design: Cross-sectional as
sessment of physicians' practice habits regarding the ordering of ambu
latory blood pressure monitoring and a longitudinal study of patient m
anagement after monitoring. Setting: Physicians' offices in central Co
nnecticut. Participants: Two hundred thirty-seven consecutive patients
referred by 65 community- and hospital-based physicians. Measurements
: Indications for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, changes in dia
gnosis and therapy, and office blood pressures before and after the am
bulatory blood pressure study. Results: The main indications for order
ing the test included borderline hypertension (27% of studies ordered)
, assessment of blood pressure control during drug therapy (25%), eval
uation for ''white coat'' or ''office'' hypertension (22%), and drug-r
esistant hypertension (16%). After the ambulatory blood pressure study
, only 13% of the patients had further testing (for example, echocardi
ography); the diagnosis was changed in 41% of the patients, and antihy
pertensive therapy was changed in 46%. In 122 patients for whom data w
ere complete, office blood pressure measured by the referring physicia
n decreased from 161/96 +/- 22/12 mm Hg before the ambulatory blood pr
essure study to 151/86 +/- 27/12 mm Hg 3 months after the study (P = 0
.004 for systolic blood pressure and P < 0.001 for diastolic blood pre
ssure). One to 2 years after the study, office blood pressure was 149/
86 +/- 24/12 mm Hg (P > 0.2 compared with 3 months after the study). S
eventy-two percent of the patients had a lower office blood pressure w
ithin 3 months of the ambulatory blood pressure study. Conclusions: Pr
acticing physicians use ambulatory blood pressure recordings for appro
priate indications, and data from the monitoring studies affected the
management of patients with hypertension.