D. Obrador et al., ACTIVE MYOCARDIAL DAMAGE WITHOUT ATTENDING INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE IN DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 21(7), 1993, pp. 1667-1671
Objectives. This study aimed to compare indium-111 (In-111)-monoclonal
antimyosin antibody uptake in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy be
fore heart transplantation with the histologic findings in the explant
ed hearts. Background. A high prevalence of In-111-monoclonal antimyos
in antibody uptake has been described in patients with dilated cardiom
yopathy, suggesting the presence of active, ongoing myocyte damage; ho
wever, no correlation between monoclonal antimyosin antibodies and his
tologic findings is available in these patients. Methods. A consecutiv
e series of 21 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy awaiting heart tra
nsplantation were studied with monoclonal antimyosin antibodies before
the operation, and the results were compared with the histologic anal
ysis of the explanted hearts. The interval between monoclonal antimyos
in antibody studies and transplantation was 1 to 90 days (mean 58 +/-
31). Results. Using a semiquantitative method (heart/lung ratio), mono
clonal antimyosin antibody uptake was present in 15 (71%) of 21 patien
ts, but active myocarditis in the explanted hearts was detected in onl
y 7. In 11 patients, intense monoclonal antimyosin antibody uptake coe
xisting with absent myocyte damage or cellular infiltration of explant
ed hearts was noted. One patient who showed preoperative monoclonal an
timyosin antibody uptake underwent transplantation 11 h later, and ex
vivo diffuse myocardial antimyosin uptake was detected, but active myo
carditis was seen only at cardiectomy in only a small area of the hear
t; the rest of the myocardium showed no signs of myocyte damage. Concl
usions. In dilated cardiomyopathy, monoclonal antimyosin antibody upta
ke cannot be equated with the presence of an inflammatory response det
ected in the myocardium of the explanted heart.