RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLINDED TRIAL OF RIFAMPIN WITH EITHER NOVOBIOCIN ORTRIMETHOPRIM-SULFAMETHOXAZOLE AGAINST METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS COLONIZATION - PREVENTION OF ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE ANDEFFECT OF HOST FACTORS ON OUTCOME
Tj. Walsh et al., RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLINDED TRIAL OF RIFAMPIN WITH EITHER NOVOBIOCIN ORTRIMETHOPRIM-SULFAMETHOXAZOLE AGAINST METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS COLONIZATION - PREVENTION OF ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE ANDEFFECT OF HOST FACTORS ON OUTCOME, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 37(6), 1993, pp. 1334-1342
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major pathogen
in hospitals. Current antimicrobial regimens for eradicating colonizi
ng strains are not well defined and are often complicated by the emerg
ence of resistance. The combination of novobiocin plus rifampin in vit
ro and in vivo was found to prevent the emergence of resistant populat
ions of initially susceptible strains of MRSA, particularly resistance
to rifampin. We therefore studied, in a randomized, double-blind, mul
ticenter comparative trial, the combination of novobiocin plus rifampi
n versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (T/S) plus rifampin in order to
determine the efficacy of each regimen in eradicating MRSA colonizati
on and to further characterize the host factors involved in the respon
se to this antimicrobial therapy. Among the 126 individuals enrolled i
n the study, 94 (80 patients; 14 hospital personnel) were evaluable. A
mong the 94 evaluable subjects, no significant demographic or medical
differences existed between the two treatment groups. Successful clear
ance of the colonizing MRSA strains was achieved in 30 of 45 (67%) sub
jects receiving novobiocin plus rifampin, whereas successful clearance
was achieved in 26 of 49 (53%) subjects treated with T/S plus rifampi
n (P = 0.18). The emergence of resistance to rifampin developed more f
requently in 14% (7 of 49) of subjects treated with T/S plus rifampin
than in 2% (1 of 45) of subjects treated with novobiocin plus rifampin
(P = 0.04). Restriction endonuclease studies of large plasmid DNA dem
onstrated that the same strain was present at pretherapy and postthera
py in most refractory cases (24 of 29 [83%] subjects). Among the 56 su
ccessfully treated subjects, clearance of MRSA was age dependent: 29 o
f 36 (80%) subjects in the 18- to 49-year-old age group, 19 of 35 (54%
) subjects in the 50- to 69-year-old age group, and 8 of 23 (35%) in t
he 70- to 94-year-old age group (P < 0.01). Clearance was also site de
pendent; culture-positive samples from wounds were related to a succes
sful outcome in only 22 (48%) of 46 subjects, whereas culture-positive
samples from sites other than wounds (e.g., nares, rectum, and sputum
) were associated with a success rate of 34 of 48 (71%) subjects (P =
0.02). Foreign bodies in wounds did not prevent the eradication of MRS
A by either regimen. T/S plus rifampin was less effective in clearing
pressure wounds compared with other wounds, whereas novobiocin plus ri
fampin was equally effective in clearing both pressure and other wound
s. There were no significant differences in toxicity between the two r
egimens. Thus, the combination of novobiocin plus rifampin, in compari
son with T/S plus rifampin, was more effective in preventing the emerg
ence of resistance to rifampin and demonstrated a trend toward greater
activity in clearing the MRSA carrier state. The response to either c
ombination depended on host factors, particularly age and the site of
MRSA colonization.