REPRODUCIBILITY OF MYOCARDIAL CONTRAST ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IN HUMAN STUDIES

Citation
H. Mudra et al., REPRODUCIBILITY OF MYOCARDIAL CONTRAST ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IN HUMAN STUDIES, Echocardiography, 10(3), 1993, pp. 255-263
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Journal title
ISSN journal
07422822
Volume
10
Issue
3
Year of publication
1993
Pages
255 - 263
Database
ISI
SICI code
0742-2822(1993)10:3<255:ROMCEI>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Experimental and clinical studies were performed to assess the ability of myocardial contrast echocardiography for quantitation of regional myocardial blood flow. To evaluate whether myocardial contrast echocar diography is a reproducible technique in humans, 18 nonselected patien ts undergoing coronary angiography were studied. A total of 107 intrac oronary injections into either the left or the right coronary artery w ere analyzed by computer assisted videodensitometry for peak intensity , contrast decay half-time, and area under the curve. By means of thes e parameters intraobserver, interobserver, and interinjection variabil ity were determined. Intraobserver measurements showed lowest variabil ity with correlation coefficients of 0.83 for contrast decay half-time , 0.93 for peak intensity, and 0.95 for area under the curve. Mean per cent error varied between 6.8% (peak intensity) and 112% (area under t he curve). The correlation coefficients for interobserver variability ranged from 0. 73 for area under the curve to 0.97 for peak intensity. Mean percent error revealed a range between 7.5% for peak intensity a nd 19% for area under the curve. For interinjection variability, the c orrelation coefficient for contrast decay half-time was lower (0.56) t han for peak intensity (0. 73) and area under the curve (0.84). Mean p ercent error were higher than for intraobserver and interobserver vari ability (range 24.1% to 34.2%). Thus, intraobserver and interobserver variability for parameters derived from time-intensity curves after in tracoronary injection of echo contrast agent in humans are sufficient and comparable to data from animal studies. Interinjection variability , however, showed a higher mean percent error. These interinjection di fferences have to be taken into account, if comparative measurements b efore and after interventions are performed.