Wa. Massey et al., CUTANEOUS IGE-MEDIATED INFLAMMATORY LESION SIZE IS INHIBITED BY AN H1ANTAGONIST (TERFENADINE) WHILE MEDIATOR RELEASE IS UNAFFECTED INVIVO AND INVITRO, Clinical and experimental allergy, 23(5), 1993, pp. 399-405
We are interested in understanding the pathogenesis of the cutaneous I
gE-mediated late phase reaction. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, r
andomized cross-over study with 10 subjects of the effect of the non-s
edating antihistamine, terfenadine (Selddane), on the cutaneous reacti
on to antigen (ragweed or mixed grass) administered intradermally and
over denuded blister bases was performed. The activity of terfenadine
on anti-IgE-induced mediator release from the skin mast cell, lung mas
t cell and basophil was also examined in vitro. Terfenadine significan
tly inhibited the size of the cutaneous reaction at every hour between
hours 1 and 9 (hr 9, control 2250 +/- 500 mm2 vs drug 1250 +/- 250 mm
2, P < 0.01, n = 10) and showed some inhibitory effect at hours 10-12.
While terfenadine blocks histamine release after nasal antigen challe
nge the release of mediators at skin blister sites was unaffected. The
infiltration of leucocytes into the blister supernatant was unaffecte
d by terfenadine although previous studies have shown significant inhi
bition with another antihistamine, cetirizine. In vitro, terfenadine,
like other antihistamines, was found to have inhibitory activity on an
ti-IgE-induced mediator release at concentrations of 10(-4)-10(-5) M i
n lung and skin mast cells and basophils. We conclude that the effects
of the newer antihistamines on cellular movement into the skin may be
diverse, that terfenadine may show organ specificity in vivo and that
terfenadine significantly decreases both the early and late gross inf
lammatory response of the skin to antigen. We cannot, as yet, explain
the mechanism(s) by which this occurs.