The perceptual octave is larger than the physical octave, i.e., most l
isteners perceive that two tones are an octave apart when their freque
ncy ratio is greater than 2. This result is known as the octave enlarg
ement effect. There are two theories for the effect, one of them a cen
tral template theory, the other a peripheral timing theory. In princip
le, it is possible to determine which theory is better by discovering
whether or not octave enlargement occurs for centrally generated dicho
tic pitches such as the Huggins pitch. Experiments show that octave en
largement does indeed occur for Huggins pitch. This is the result pred
icted by the central template theory, but it can be argued that the re
sult does not entirely eliminate the timing theory. A detailed examina
tion of the two theories shows that each requires revision in order to
make the octave enlargement prediction follow logically from its prem
ises. The central template theory requires the auditory system to diff
erentiate excitation caused by different harmonics of a complex tone o
n some basis other than place of excitation. Neural synchrony is sugge
sted as a basis. The timing theory, originally formulated in terms of
a neural interspike interval timing, can be made internally consistent
by replacing the neural interspike-interval circuit by a neural autoc
orrelator.