TRANSDERMAL ESTROGEN WITH A LEVONORGESTREL-RELEASING INTRAUTERINE-DEVICE FOR CLIMACTERIC COMPLAINTS VERSUS ESTRADIOL-RELEASING VAGINAL RINGWITH A VAGINAL PROGESTERONE SUPPOSITORY - CLINICAL AND ENDOMETRIAL RESPONSES
G. Antoniou et al., TRANSDERMAL ESTROGEN WITH A LEVONORGESTREL-RELEASING INTRAUTERINE-DEVICE FOR CLIMACTERIC COMPLAINTS VERSUS ESTRADIOL-RELEASING VAGINAL RINGWITH A VAGINAL PROGESTERONE SUPPOSITORY - CLINICAL AND ENDOMETRIAL RESPONSES, Maturitas, 26(2), 1997, pp. 103-111
Objective: Our purpose was to compare the effects of a new estradiol-r
eleasing vaginal ring with progesterone given as a vaginal suppository
, versus the efficacy, safety and acceptability of an intrauterine dev
ice releasing levonorgestrel combined with estradiol, delivered transd
ermally from a patch. Climacteric symptoms, bleeding pattern and endom
etrial histologic features were studied. Methods: Fifty six parous, po
stmenopausal women with urogenital symptoms were allocated in two grou
ps for one year: 28 women receiving estradiol by a vaginal ring and a
100 mg vaginal progesterone suppository 7 days every month and 28 wome
n receiving a continuous transdermal daily dose of 50 mu g of estradio
l with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device inserted. All th
e patients were subjected to vaginosonographic examination followed by
thorough pathological examination of the uterine curetting samples. R
esults: A mean endometrial thickness (double layer) of 2.9 and 3.0 mm,
respectively, was found to be predictive of normal endometrium. Both
treatment regimens effectively relieved climacteric symptoms. Endometr
ial proliferation was not observed. Spotting was more common in the in
trauterine device group than in the vaginal ring group. Conclusions: T
reatment of urogenital symptoms in postmenopausal women with these two
forms of hormone replacement therapy is shown to be an effective and
safe method, exhibiting advantages over other methods of treatment. (C
) 1997 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.