Js. Flier et al., INSULIN-MEDIATED PSEUDOACROMEGALY - CLINICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL-CHARACTERIZATION OF A SYNDROME OF SELECTIVE INSULIN-RESISTANCE, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 76(6), 1993, pp. 1533-1541
We have performed clinical, physiological, in vitro biochemical and ge
netic studies of a patient with severe insulin resistance associated w
ith the phenotype of ''pseudoacromegaly,'' defined as the presence of
acromegaloid features in the absence of elevated levels of GH or insul
in-like growth factor-I (IGF-I). Despite marked hyperinsulinemia, insu
lin and IGF-I binding to circulating blood cells and cultured skin fib
roblasts was normal. Insulin and IGF-1-stimulated autophosphorylation
of their respective receptors in cultured skin fibroblasts was also no
rmal. However, neither insulin nor IGF-I were able to stimulate 2-deox
y D-glucose uptake by cultured skin fibroblasts. In contrast, the abil
ity of insulin and IGF-I (or IGF-II) to stimulate amino acid uptake an
d thymidine incorporation into DNA was not impaired. This unique disco
rdant signaling defect through both insulin and IGF-I receptors appear
ed not to be the consequence of altered expression or primary structur
e of the insulin receptor or the GLUT-4 glucose transporter, as assess
ed by several genetic and biochemical techniques. GLUT-4 expression in
muscle was normal on Western blots, and SSCP screening of all 11 exon
s of the gene for nucleotide variation revealed no variations from nor
mal. DNA sequencing and SSCP screening of exons 2-22 of the insulin re
ceptor gene revealed only one variation predicted to alter the amino a
cid sequence (Val985-->Met). No functional differences between Met985
and wild-type human insulin receptors were evident in studies performe
d with Chinese hamster ovary cell transfectants that overexpress eithe
r receptor. This data combined with our previously published epidemiol
ogical data concerning the frequency of the Met985 allele, indicate th
at this variant insulin receptor is not responsible for the insulin re
sistant glucose uptake or the clinical syndrome of pseudoacromegaly. W
e conclude that: 1) The molecular lesion responsible for the selective
biochemical defect in this individual appears to involve a signaling
intermediate required for insulin and IGF-I regulation of glucose tran
sport, and/or an effector mechanism operative in this process. 2) Cell
s derived from this patient may be a valuable tool in the search for s
uch molecular mechanisms. 3) The Met985 allele is a relatively common
variant which has no demonstrable adverse consequences for insulin rec
eptor function. 4) Pseudoacromegaly can be viewed as the expected resu
lt of hyperinsulinemia driving the unopposed mitogenic and anabolic ac
tions of insulin.