SUPPRESSIVE EFFECT OF DOXORUBICIN ON LIVER RECURRENCE AFTER RESECTIONOF COLONIC VX2 CANCER LESIONS - DIFFERENCE IN EFFICACY ACCORDING TO THE INJECTION PROTOCOL

Citation
M. Sakane et al., SUPPRESSIVE EFFECT OF DOXORUBICIN ON LIVER RECURRENCE AFTER RESECTIONOF COLONIC VX2 CANCER LESIONS - DIFFERENCE IN EFFICACY ACCORDING TO THE INJECTION PROTOCOL, SURGERY TODAY-THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 23(6), 1993, pp. 514-520
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
ISSN journal
09411291
Volume
23
Issue
6
Year of publication
1993
Pages
514 - 520
Database
ISI
SICI code
0941-1291(1993)23:6<514:SEODOL>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
An animal model with liver cancer recurrence was induced by resecting colonic VX2 cancer lesions in 57 rabbits, and the effects of doxorubic in (ADR) on the recurrence were examined. Animals were divided into a control group and three chemotherapeutic groups: a portal injection gr oup, to which ADR was injected into the portal vein after resection of the primary lesions; a peripheral injection group, to which ADR was i njected into a peripheral vein after resection; and a preoperative inj ection group, to which an ADR dose of 0.5 mg/kg was peripherally injec ted 0, 1, and 2 days prior to resection followed by a portal injection of ADR 0.5 mg/kg after resection. The rate of liver recurrence was 10 0% in the control group, whereas it was 0% and 60% in the portal ADR 1 .0 and 0.5 mg/kg injection groups, and 60% and 100% in the peripheral ADR 1.0 and 0.5 mg/kg injection groups. In the preoperative group, the rate was 0%, 100%, and 67% in the animals injected 2, 1, and 0 days p rior to resection, respectively. These results suggest that portal inj ection or appropriate combinations of preoperative peripheral and port al injections of ADR are more effective than peripheral or portal inje ction alone in the suppression of liver recurrence.