If there is a Jamesian ''tradition, '' it is to he located in James's
own skepticism toward theorizing, his commitment to a serious and mora
lly informed pragmatism, and his resolve to accept the facts of psycho
logical life where they are found, without editing or distorting them
to serve a pet paradigm. This orientation virtually precludes a Jamesi
an school of psychology, but establishes James's works as abidingly im
portant when the discipline undertakes the necessary if chastening bur
dens of self-criticism.