A. Junghardt et al., PATTERN ELECTRORETINOGRAM AND VISUAL-EVOKED POTENTIAL AMPLITUDES ARE INFLUENCED BY DIFFERENT STIMULUS FIELD SIZES AND SCOTOMAS, Documenta ophthalmologica, 83(2), 1993, pp. 139-149
The pattern electroretinogram and the visual evoked potential were rec
orded simultaneously with various stimulus fields and artificial scoto
mata of increasing sizes. In contrast to an earlier study, a smaller c
heck size (20') and two stimulus field sizes (20-degrees x 20-degrees
and 10-degrees x 10-degrees) for the scotomata were used. With a conce
ntric decreasing stimulus field, a reduction of both the pattern elect
roretinogram and visual evoked potential was found. Both showed a simu
ltaneous reduction of amplitudes, but, compared with the amplitude in
the full field, the reduction was more extensive for the pattern elect
roretinogram at each test field size. This implies a greater contribut
ion to the pattern electroretinogram from more eccentric retinal parts
. An artificial central scotoma of increasing size in the 20-degrees x
20-degrees field had less influence on the pattern electroretinogram
than on the visual evoked potential. The percentage amplitude loss of
the visual evoked potential was more pronounced. The visual evoked pot
ential was eventually abolished by a scotoma size from 10-degrees x 10
-degrees upward, while the pattern electroretinogram was still registr
able. When scotomata of similar size were introduced in a smaller (10-
degrees x 10-degrees) field, percentage pattern electroretinogram and
visual evoked potential amplitude losses were less separated than in a
larger (20-degrees x 20-degrees) test field.