Jm. Bernard et al., SPINAL OR SYSTEMIC ANALGESIA AFTER EXTENSIVE SPINAL SURGERY - COMPARISON BETWEEN INTRATHECAL MORPHINE AND INTRAVENOUS FENTANYL PLUS CLONIDINE, Journal of clinical anesthesia, 5(3), 1993, pp. 231-236
Study Objective: To compare two different methods of postoperative ana
lgesia after extensive spinal fusion. Design: Double-blind, randomized
study. Setting: University-affiliated hospital. Patients: Twenty four
adult patients undergoing scoliosis correction. Interventions: Before
the end of surgery, patients received either intravenous clonidine 0.
3 mug/kg/hr and fentanyl 25 mug/kg (after an hourly dose of clonidine
2.5 mug/kg) or intrathecal morphine 0.3 mg. A saline infusion was admi
nistered to patients receiving morphine intrathecally. Measurements an
d Main Results: Pain and sedation scores, hemodynamic data, and blood
gases were collected in the recovery room at tracheal extubation and t
hen every 2 hours for the next 14 hours. Tracheal extubation was perfo
rmed at the same time in both groups (i.e., an average of 4 hours afte
r the analgesic regimens were started). Intrathecal morphine provided
a mean score of 20 mm on a visual analog scale ranging from 0 mm (no p
ain) to 100 mm (severe pain), but it resulted in increased PaCO2 at ex
tubation (44 +/- 7 mmHg) and 2 hours later (42 +/- 7 mmHg). PaCO2 was
greater than 50 mmHg in four patients receiving intrathecal morphine.
Fentanyl-clonidine resulted in equipotent analgesia but was accompanie
d by sedation (sleeping but arousal by light tactile stimulation) and
moderate hypotension (up to 69 +/- 9 mmHg for mean arterial pressure).
Conclusions: This study shows that there is a major risk of respirato
ry depression with a single intrathecal dose of morphine 0.3 mg to con
trol postoperative pain after scoliosis surgery. Systemic clonidine-fe
ntanyl may be a possible approach to the postoperative pain treatment
of this surgery.