Cst. Aun et al., CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECTS OF IV INDUCTION IN CHILDREN - COMPARISON BETWEEN PROPOFOL AND THIOPENTONE, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 70(6), 1993, pp. 647-653
We have compared the haemodynamic responses to i.v. propofol 2.5 mg kg
-1 with those to thiopentone 5.0 mg kg-1 in 41 healthy Chinese childre
n at induction of anaesthesia. They were allocated to four groups acco
rding to their age and induction agent received: group 1 < 2 yr, propo
fol, n = 9; group II < 2 yr, thiopentone, n = 9; group III 2-12 yr, pr
opofol, n = 12; group IV 2-12 yr, thiopentone, n = 11. Anaesthesia was
maintained by spontaneous ventilation with 70% nitrous oxide and 0.5%
halothane in oxygen. Arterial pressure and heart rate were monitored
by automatic oscillotonometer. Stroke volume was measured by two-dimen
sional echocardiography and pulse Doppler. Measurements were made befo
re induction and at 1-min intervals for 5 min after induction. The red
uction in mean arterial pressure was significantly greater after propo
fol (28-31%) than after thiopentone (14-21%) (P = 0.00 1). The reducti
on in cardiac index (10-15%) after induction was not significantly dif
ferent between the two agents (P = 0. 122). Baroreflex mediated increa
ses in heart rate and systemic vascular resistance were less after pro
pofol than after thiopentone. The baroreceptor reflex was more attenua
ted in children aged less than 2 yr than in older children.