Ja. Mauriello et K. Pokorny, USE OF SPLIT-THICKNESS DERMAL GRAFTS TO REPAIR CORNEAL AND SCLERAL DEFECTS - A STUDY OF 10 PATIENTS, British journal of ophthalmology, 77(6), 1993, pp. 327-331
The use of split-thickness derm graphs for successful repair of cornea
l and scleral defects is reported in 10 patients (11 eyes) who had non
-infectious, impending, or overt ocular perforation. In all patients,
traditional methods of reconstruction were deemed inappropriate or had
already failed. Corneoscleral defects occurred after various operatio
ns: pterygium excision, retinal detachment repair, insertion of a kera
toprosthesis (Cardona implant) into an opaque, vascularised cornea, an
d penetrating keratoplasty. Other causes of corneoscleral defects were
scleromalacia perforans, idiopathic systemic vasculitis, alkali burn,
ocular cicatricial pemphigoid, and band keratopathy with recurrent er
osion following intraocular metallic foreign body. We propose the use
of split-thickness grafts: (1) when adjacent conjunctiva is inadequate
to cover a corneoscleral defect owing to its large size or great dept
h or to conjunctival scarring from previous operations, injury, or ocu
lar cicatricial pemphigoid; or (2) as an alternative to autogenous gra
fts such as conjunctiva, cartilage, fascia lata, tibial periosteum, or
mucous membrane as well as to homologous scleral and lamellar grafts.
Dermal grafts are advantageous in that they are autogenous, non-antig
enic, survive on avascular surfaces, and self-epithelialise and, thus,
need not be covered by conjunctiva. Furthermore, they are pliable, ha
ve excellent tensile strength, provide ample tectile support, and are
abundantly available. Dermal grafts are harvested from the dermal bed
of the thigh after an epidermal flap is hinged at one end.