Se. Litwiller et al., VAGINAL WALL SLING - LONG-TERM OUTCOME ANALYSIS OF FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO PATIENT SATISFACTION AND SURGICAL SUCCESS, The Journal of urology, 157(4), 1997, pp. 1279-1282
Purpose: The clinical outcome of the vaginal wall sling was retrospect
ively evaluated to determine patient perception, satisfaction and fact
ors contributing to postoperative success. Materials and Methods: An o
utcome based study was conducted of 51 patients undergoing constructio
n of a vaginal wall sling for genuine stress incontinence or intrinsic
sphincteric deficiency. Preoperative symptoms, demographic parameters
and video urodynamic studies were correlated with postoperative patie
nt perception of symptoms to determine patient satisfaction and factor
s contributing to overall success. Results: Of 42 patients (82%) avail
able for followup 31 (74%) reported improvement in continence, 26 (62%
) are currently satisfied with the urinary status, 72% in retrospect w
ould repeat the procedure and 69% would recommend the vaginal wall sli
ng to others. Despite long-term resolution of stress incontinence in 9
2% of those with genuine stress incontinence and 75% with intrinsic sp
hincter deficiency, postoperative urge incontinence was the single mos
t important factor affecting patient satisfaction (p = 0.001), Patient
s without postoperative urge incontinence enjoyed the greatest levels
of satisfaction, in excess of 90% (p = 0.001). Although preoperative l
eak point pressure correlated with resolution of stress incontinence,
no preoperative demographic factors, symptoms or urodynamic parameters
could reliably predict postoperative patient satisfaction. Conclusion
s: The vaginal wall sling represents an excellent option for the treat
ment of genuine stress incontinence and an acceptable option for intri
nsic sphincteric deficiency. Patient perception and satisfaction remai
n closely associated with presence or resolution of postoperative urge
incontinence. However, prediction of postoperative urge incontinence
remains a challenge and should be considered when counseling patients
preoperatively.