CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF M43 - A NOVEL CANCER-ASSOCIATED MUCIN EPITOPE

Citation
R. Goodgame et al., CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF M43 - A NOVEL CANCER-ASSOCIATED MUCIN EPITOPE, Cancer research, 53(12), 1993, pp. 2803-2809
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00085472
Volume
53
Issue
12
Year of publication
1993
Pages
2803 - 2809
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-5472(1993)53:12<2803:COM-AN>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
A monoclonal antibody to colon carcinoma mucin was found to react with a colon carcinoma-associated carbohydrate epitope. This antibody was used to develop a quantitative solid phase immunoassay, M43. We prospe ctively and retrospectively evaluated the assay in patients with and w ithout gastrointestinal carcinoma and compared the sensitivity and spe cificity with that of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA 19-9. One hundred ninety-two patients (181 with no evidence of malignancy) refer red for upper or lower gastrointestinal endoscopy were prospectively s tudied. Sera from 172 patients with histologically confirmed gastroint estinal adenocarcinoma were retrospectively studied. Optimal discrimin ation cutoffs for M43 (5 units/ml), CEA (5 ng/ml), and CA 19-9 (30 uni ts/ml) were determined by receiver operating characteristic curves ana lysis. M43 was positive in 112 of 151 patients with colorectal carcino ma (sensitivity 74%) and was negative in 167 of 181 patients without c arcinoma (specificity 92%). Sensitivity and specificity were 77% and 9 3% for CEA and 60% and 83% for CA 19-9. Sixty-four % of 73 patients wi th colorectal carcinoma limited to the bowel wall had a positive M43 w ith a mean value of 178 units/ml. Eighty-one % of 27 patients with non hepatic metastasis had a positive M43 with a mean value of 223 units/m l. Eighty-four % of 51 patients with hepatic metastasis had a positive M43 assay with a mean value of 2532 units/ml. Sensitivity in these th ree groups was 67%, 82%, and 82%, respectively, for CEA and 43%, 68%, and 79%, respectively, for CA 19-9. Of 38 carcinoma patients with a ne gative CEA, 45% had a positive M43. No correlation between the levels of M43 and CEA in patients with colorectal carcinoma was found. We con clude that M43 is positive in most patients with colorectal carcinoma, even in early stages. As a diagnostic test, its sensitivity and speci ficity are equivalent to those of CEA. However, the M43 assay is measu ring a tumor antigen which is fundamentally different from CEA and whi ch is present in a high percentage of CEA-negative patients.