This paper develops a model of executive leadership consisting of four
competing roles: Vision Selter, Motivator, Analyzer, and Task Master.
These four roles are operationalized and hypotheses are then tested c
oncerning their relationships to three dimensions of firm performance
using data collected from a sample of 916 top managers. Results sugges
t that CEOs with high ''behavioral complexity'' - the ability to play
multiple, competing roles - produce the best firm performance, particu
larly with respect to business performance (growth and innovation) and
organizational (stakeholder) effectiveness. Executive leadership role
had little to do with firms' financial performance.