Two alternative models of legislative outcomes are the minimum winning
coalition and the competitive equilibrium (Koford, 1982). In a unidim
ensional setting, the outcome under the former is the median, while th
e outcome under the latter is the highest net demand location. This pa
per describes the competitive equilibrium in a unidimensional model, a
nd shows that under some common conditions it coincides with the media
n, in particular for pure redistributive issues. However, for distribu
tive issues, the two equilibria will differ. Finally, the comparative
statics of the two models are examined; while the winning coalition is
sensitive only to changes in the location of the median, for ''distri
butive'' issues the competitive equilibrium has the standard ''economi
c'' comparative statics that the outcome adjusts in the direction of t
he change in preferences.