The anthropological world has changed. The ethnographic Other is no lo
nger available and pliant, awaiting anthropological representation, bu
t has acquired a voice of his/her own. As a result, anthropology is fa
ced with a dilemma. What is to be the anthropological role in this tra
nsformed world? Two alternatives are examined. The first, postmodernis
m, stresses the development of experimental ethnographic texts that in
scribe the voice of the transformed Other. Noting the weaknesses of th
e postmodern 'solution,' this paper proposes community-centered resear
ch as a more appropriate response to contemporary social realities. In
this approach, the anthropologist seeks collaboration with the Other
in the struggle for self-determination. Illustration is provided with
the case study of anthropologists employed in a Puerto Rican community
based organization (CBO), with specific reference to the emergence an
d development of the substance abuse prevention and treatment work of
this CBO. While noting the difficulties of this role, the paper argues
that scholarly activism, a model adopted from the Third World, is wel
l suited to the postmodern world.