FOOD AVAILABILITY AND DIET COMPOSITION OF 3 COEXISTING MEDITERRANEAN LIMPETS (PATELLA SPP)

Citation
P. Dellasantina et al., FOOD AVAILABILITY AND DIET COMPOSITION OF 3 COEXISTING MEDITERRANEAN LIMPETS (PATELLA SPP), Marine Biology, 116(1), 1993, pp. 87-95
Citations number
47
Categorie Soggetti
Marine & Freshwater Biology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00253162
Volume
116
Issue
1
Year of publication
1993
Pages
87 - 95
Database
ISI
SICI code
0025-3162(1993)116:1<87:FAADCO>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
The gut contents of three intertidal patellid limpets were analysed by collecting foraging specimens on a breakwater on the Tyrrhenian coast (central Italy) between May 1988 and October 1989. The three species coexist there showing a different, but partially overlapping zonation: Patella aspera dominates the infralittoral fringe; the majority of P. caerulea inhabits the lower midlittoral, while P. rustica is most abu ndant in the upper midlittoral. The algae present on slivers of substr atum over which each limpet collected was moving were identified. More over, floristic surveys were made along the shore in order to characte rize the algal cover of the different zonal belts. The floristic study revealed that the basic elements of algal communities typical of west ern Mediterranean rocky shores are present in the study area. The alga e found on the slivers under the foraging limpets were generally repre sentative of the algal community typical of the same zone. There was a marked difference between the diets of P. rustica and P. aspera due t o the fact that the first species forages on a few low lying epilithic and endolithic Cyanophyceae, while P. aspera feeds on a large number of species belonging to all the main algal classes and life forms cons idered, including frondose epilithics and epiphytics. The diet of P. c aerulea resembles that of P. aspera in algal heterogeneity, but is dom inated by Cyanophyceae as in P. rustica. A detailed analysis of the di fferences between gut contents of each limpet species and the relative slivers showed an obvious general correspondence, but revealed also t hat the diets of the three species do not completely reflect the avail ability of algae. These findings suggest that the basic diet segregati on mechanism between the three populations is their zonal separation. However, the difference in gut contents of heterospecific limpets fora ging in the same zone suggests the existence of supplementary morpho-f unctional or behavioural mechanisms for diet segregation between the t hree species.