Experience with intrarectal ultrasonography (IRUS) is limited for the
evaluation of perianal sepsis. The purpose of this article is to repor
t our experience with IRUS in evaluating 24 cases of suspected periana
l abscess and fistula. IRUS was performed intraoperatively using a Bru
el & Kjaer (Model #1846; Naerum, Denmark) endoanal ultrasound scanner
with a 7-MHz transducer. After completion of the IRUS, careful anorect
al examination and appropriate surgical therapy were performed. At sur
gery, 19/24 patients were found to have perirectal abscesses. with all
19 cases correctly identified preoperatively by IRUS. In 12 cases (63
percent), IRUS correctly defined the relationship between the abscess
es and sphincters by Parks' classification. At surgery, internal openi
ngs of fistulous tracts were found in 14/19 cases, but IRUS identified
only 4/14 (28 percent). In 6/24 cases, IRUS and clinical evaluation d
id not demonstrate a perirectal abscess. The role of IRUS in the evalu
ation of perirectal abscess is evolving. Certainly, uncomplicated absc
esses can be managed without ultrasonography. However, IRUS can be an
adjunct to careful evaluation of complex perianal suppurative disease.