Jl. Netterville et al., SILASTIC MEDIALIZATION AND ARYTENOID ADDUCTION - THE VANDERBILT EXPERIENCE - A REVIEW OF 116 PHONOSURGICAL PROCEDURES, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology, 102(6), 1993, pp. 413-424
From April 1987 to April 1992, 116 phonosurgical procedures were perfo
rmed to treat glottal incompetence. The initial numbers of these surgi
cal procedures included the following: 29 primary Silastic medializati
ons, 3 primary Silastic medializations with arytenoid adduction, 53 se
condary Silastic medializations, 4 secondary Silastic medializations w
ith arytenoid adduction, and 11 bilateral Silastic medializations. The
se procedures arc useful in treating unilateral true vocal cord paraly
sis, scarring, bowing, or paresis, as well as bilateral true vocal cor
d bowing. Of the initial 100 patients, 16 later underwent a revision w
ith either a larger implant's being placed or an arytenoid adduction.
Primary Silastic medialization is the placement of an implant under ge
neral anesthesia in the same surgical setting in which laryngeal inner
vation is sacrificed. Secondary Silastic medialization is the placemen
t of an implant under local anesthesia for a preexistent vocal cord ma
lfunction. In either case, overall voice results for unilateral paraly
sis are very good. Primary Silastic medialization significantly decrea
ses the postoperative rehabilitation period in skull base patients bec
ause of the immediate postoperative glottal competence and decreased u
se of perioperative tracheotomy. Bilateral implants yielded good resul
ts in 6 patients with presbylaryngis, but 6 other patients with bowing
from other causes experienced only moderate improvement in speech qua
lity. There were no implant extrusions; however, 1 implant was removed
secondary to a persistent laryngocutaneous fistula in a patient who h
ad previously undergone laryngeal irradiation. This was the only compl
ication in this series.