Jk. Niparko et al., COCHLEAR WALL TITANIUM IMPLANTS FOR AUDITORY-NERVE STIMULATION, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology, 102(6), 1993, pp. 447-454
Genetically deaf dalmatian dogs and ototoxically deafened macaque monk
eys were implanted with electrodes housed in cochlear wall titanium im
plants to assess long-term stability, tolerance, and performance. Shor
t-term human implantation, followed by trials of stimulation, was perf
ormed in 4 unilaterally deaf patients. In the dog experiments, cochlea
r wall electrode stimulation produced consistent electrophysiologic th
resholds that were higher, by approximately 6 dB, than those obtained
with bipolar scala tympani stimulation. Clinical testing revealed elec
trically evoked middle latency response, auditory brain stem response,
and/or behavioral detection responses in 3 of 4 patients, at levels b
elow those for facial nerve activation and pain sensation. Electrode p
lace discrimination studies, with controls for loudness cues, revealed
near-perfect discrimination in a monkey subject. Eleven of the 12 ani
mal implants were found to be rigidly fixed in the cochlear bone, with
direct contact between bone and implant over 8% to 23% of the implant
surface for the 6 implants examined in detail. These results suggest
that long-term fixation of titanium cochlear wall implants occurs by v
irtue of intimate implant-bone contact in restricted areas. This appro
ach to prosthetic stimulation demonstrates encouraging performance cha
racteristics in achieving auditory activation.