Venous thromboembolic disease is a frequent complication in patients w
ith intracranial malignancies. Because these patients are often percei
ved to be at increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage with anticoagul
ation, inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are frequently used in their t
reatment. We reviewed the records of 49 patients with intracranial mal
ignancies and venous thromboembolic disease to determine the effective
ness of, and the complications resulting from, treatment. Of the 42 pa
tients receiving IVC filters, a strikingly high percentage (62%) devel
oped complications. Twelve percent developed recurrent pulmonary embol
ism, while 57% developed either IVC or filter thrombosis, recurrent de
ep venous thrombosis, or post-phlebitic syndrome. These complications
severely reduced the quality of life of the affected patients. Only 15
of our patients were treated with anticoagulation, and seven of these
received it because of continued thromboembolic disease. None of thes
e 15 patients had proven hemorrhagic complications. This study suggest
s that the complication rate of IVC filters in patients with brain tum
ors is higher than commonly perceived and may outweigh the risk of ant
icoagulation.