Gm. Humphris et al., PERCEPTION OF RISK OF HIV-INFECTION FROM REGULAR ATTENDERS TO AN INDUSTRIAL DENTAL SERVICE, British Dental Journal, 174(10), 1993, pp. 371-378
The advent of the HIV pandemic has necessitated the introduction of co
nsistent cross-infection procedures for dentistry. Suprisingly little
is known of patient reactions to some of these changes. A structured q
uestionnaire was administered (in 1988/9, n = 613) to regular-attendin
g patients of an industrial dental service to assess their views towar
ds cross-infection procedures. Approximately a third of the study samp
le believed that there was a slight risk or more of contracting HIV in
fection at the dentist. This risk perception attenuated with further v
isits to the dentist. Some patients (13%) claimed to be aware from the
media of someone having been cross-infected with the HIV virus from a
dental visit. The majority of patients prefer the dentist to adopt th
e barrier methods of mask and glove wearing. Over 60% of patients woul
d like their dentist to wear a mask when in fact a mask had not been w
orn. Accuracy of recall by patients for mask wearing was only 70% and
for glove wearing 88%. The possibility that drawing the patient's atte
ntion to cross-infection control may be reassuring for the patient was
not supported with some evidence to suggest that in instances where t
he dentist provided treatment, the patient's perception of risk was in
creased.