Sj. Donegan et al., CANINE TOOTH GUIDANCE AND TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT SOUNDS IN NONPATIENTS AND PATIENTS, Journal of oral rehabilitation, 23(12), 1996, pp. 799-804
In 46 non-patients and 46 patients, the authors examined the presence
(+) and absence (-) of canine tooth guidance (CG), i.e. dynamic dental
articulation events in contrast to static dental occlusion events. Du
ring a right and a left laterotrusion of the mandible, the number of s
imple, mutually exclusive and exhaustive tooth guidance events (possib
ilities) was four. In addition, the authors examined the associations
between temporomandibular joint (TMJ) sounds and canine guidance event
s. In non-patients, CG+ was relatively infrequent (30%), and CG- was r
elatively frequent (70%). In patients, CG+ was relatively infrequent (
22%), and CG- was relatively frequent (78%). In both non-patients and
patients, bilateral CG+ was rather infrequent (15%). In both nonpatien
ts and patients with the presence of TMJ sounds, CG+ was relatively in
frequent (38%) while CG- was relatively frequent (61%). In non-patient
s as well as patients, no evidence was found that distal CG+ (putative
lateral retrusive guidance) was associated with ipsilateral TMJ sound
s (relative risk = 0%), nor that the association between mesial CG+ (p
utative lateral protrusive guidance) and ipsilateral TMJ sounds was be
yond that of mere chance (relative risk = 50%).