Me. Bedford et al., TEST OF THE MULTIFACTORIAL AGING METHOD USING SKELETONS WITH KNOWN AGES-AT-DEATH FROM THE GRANT COLLECTION, American journal of physical anthropology, 91(3), 1993, pp. 287-297
The multifactorial aging method has been shown to be a highly reliable
method of skeletal aging because it incorporates age information from
as many age indicators as are available for each skeleton (Lovejoy et
al.; Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 68.1-14,1985). The present study was a b
lind test to assess its accuracy on a skeletal sample composed of 55 i
ndividuals with verified death certificates (Grant Collection, Univers
ity of Toronto). Three authors (C.O.L., M.E.B., and K.F.R.), with no a
ccess to the death certificate ages, independently seriated and aged t
he sample using three to four criteria: auricular surface, pubic symph
ysis, and radiographs of the proximal femur and clavicle. Summary ages
were then calculated for each individual in the sample. The authors'
independent summary age estimates showed strong correlations with one
another (r = 0.84-0.89). Multifactorial age estimates correlated bette
r with real age than did those from any single indicator used. The mea
n error (averaging 8.7 years) for summary age was at least 1 year less
than that for any single indicator. Average bias ranged from -0.7 (un
derage) to 1.4 (overage) years. These results indicate that utilizatio
n of several age indicators, weighted according to their reliability,
helps control for variation in the changes that occur with age in any
single morphological indicator. This method may therefore be considere
d one of the most accurate available for the determination of skeletal
age-at-death, particularly for paleodemographic analysis.