Tr. Kosten et al., BUPRENORPHINE VERSUS METHADONE-MAINTENANCE FOR OPIOID DEPENDENCE, The Journal of nervous and mental disease, 181(6), 1993, pp. 358-364
Buprenorphine at 2 mg and 6 mg daily was compared with methadone at 35
mg and 65 mg during 24 weeks of maintenance among 125 opioid-dependen
t patients. As hypothesized, 6 mg of buprenorphine were superior to 2
mg of buprenorphine in reducing illicit opioid use, but higher dosage
did not improve treatment retention. Self-reported illicit opioid use
declined substantially in all groups, but by the third month, signific
antly more heroin abuse was reported at 2 mg than at 6 mg of buprenorp
hine or of methadone. From an initial average of $1860/month, month 3
usage dropped to $41 (methadone 65 mg), $73 (methadone 35 mg), $118 (b
uprenorphine 6 mg), and $351/month (buprenorphine 2 mg). Days of use a
lso dropped from 29 days to 1.7 (methadone 65 mg), 2.8 (methadone 35 m
g), 4.0 (buprenorphine 6 mg), and 6.6 days/month (buprenorphine 2 mg).
This relatively low efficacy for 2 mg of buprenorphine persisted thro
ugh month 6 of the trial, with 7.2 days/month and $235/month of use fo
r buprenorphine at 2 mg versus 1.9 days/month and $65/month for the ot
her three groups. Increased opioid abuse also was associated with sign
ificantly greater and persistent opioid withdrawal symptoms. Our secon
dary hypothesis, that buprenorphine would be equivalent to methadone i
n efficacy, was not supported. Treatment retention was significantly b
etter on methadone (20 vs. 16 weeks), and methadone patients had signi
ficantly more opioid-free urines (51% vs. 26%). Abstinence for at leas
t 3 weeks was also more common on methadone than buprenorphine (65% vs
. 27%). Thus, methadone was clearly superior to these two buprenorphin
e doses, but illicit opioid use was reduced more by higher than lower
buprenorphine dosage. Future studies need to examine higher sublingual
buprenorphine doses of 12 mg to 20 mg daily for potential efficacy.