Do. Clegg et al., COMPARISON OF SULFASALAZINE AND PLACEBO IN THE TREATMENT OF ANKYLOSING-SPONDYLITIS - A DEPARTMENT-OF-VETERANS-AFFAIRS COOPERATIVE STUDY, Arthritis and rheumatism, 39(12), 1996, pp. 2004-2012
Objective. To determine whether sulfasalazine (SSZ) at a dosage of 2,0
00 mg/day is effective for the treatment of active ankylosing spondyli
tis (AS) that is not controlled with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory dru
g therapy. Methods. Two hundred sixty-four patients with AS were recru
ited from 15 clinics, randomized (double-blind) to SSZ or placebo trea
tment, and followed up for 36 weeks. Treatment response was based on m
orning stiffness, back pain, and physician and patient global assessme
nts. Results. While longitudinal analysis revealed a trend favoring SS
Z in the middle of treatment, no difference was seen at the end of tre
atment. Response rates were 38.2% for SSZ and 36.1% for placebo (P = 0
.73). The Westergren erythrocyte sedimentation rate declined more with
SSZ treatment than with placebo (P < 0.0001). AS patients with associ
ated peripheral arthritis showed improvement that favored SSZ (P = 0.0
2). Adverse reactions were fewer than expected and were mainly due to
nonspecific gastrointestinal complaints. Conclusion. SSZ at a dosage o
f 2,000 mg/day does not seem to be more effective than placebo in the
treatment of AS patients with chronic, longstanding disease. SSZ is we
ll tolerated and may be more effective than placebo in the treatment o
f AS patients with peripheral joint involvement. This effect is more p
ronounced in treatment of the peripheral arthritis in this subgroup of
AS patients.