Km. Mcpherson et B. Pentland, DISABILITY IN PATIENTS FOLLOWING TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY - WHICH MEASURE, International journal of rehabilitation research, 20(1), 1997, pp. 1-10
Head injury results in a wide range of functional sequelae. Thus, meas
uring solely physical aspects of functioning may fail to highlight the
actual level of disability. This study compares a commonly used measu
re of physical disability, the Barthel Index, with three recently devi
sed measures - the OPCS Scales of Disability, the Functional Independe
nce Measure (FIM) and Functional Assessment Measure (FIM + FAM). Fifty
-four head-injured subjects were assessed following discharge-from an
in-patient rehabilitation unit utilizing each measure. The majority of
subjects had no detectable disability according to the Barthel Index.
In contrast, only four subjects (7%) attained maximal scores for inde
pendence with the OPCS scale; two (4%) with the FIM and only one subje
ct (2%) with the FIM + FAM. This reflected the nature of the disabilit
ies in activities such as intellectual functioning, communication, beh
aviour and wider aspects of mobility measured by the OPCS, FIM and FIM
+ FAM but not in the Barthel Index. The relationship between all meas
ures was significant (Spearman ranked correlations P < 0.001) but corr
elations were greater between OPCS, FIM and FIM + FAM than with the Ba
rthel. The results of this study would support considering the use of
scales other than the Barthel Index when describing disability followi
ng traumatic head injury.