Jm. Campanario, CONSOLATION FOR THE SCIENTIST - SOMETIMES IT IS HARD TO PUBLISH PAPERS THAT ARE LATER HIGHLY-CITED, Social studies of science, 23(2), 1993, pp. 342-362
Citations number
61
Categorie Soggetti
History & Philosophy of Sciences","History & Philosophy of Sciences","History & Philosophy of Sciences
A set of 316 commentaries by authors of highly-cited papers was review
ed, to identify any difficulty encountered by the authors in producing
or publishing their articles. The commentaries were selected from tho
se published each week in the Citation Classic(R) feature of Current C
ontents. According to their commentaries, a small proportion (5.7%) of
the authors of these papers had some difficulty when doing the resear
ch, or when trying to publish the results. Three more highly-cited pap
ers which had also encountered difficulties in getting published were
identified from Citation Classic(R) commentaries: one of them was co-a
uthored by a Nobel Prize winner. Three of the papers which encountered
publication problems are the most cited from their respective journal
s. In part, the problematic papers reported innovative methods or theo
ries, or presented new interpretations of previous data. Those in the
peer review system should have access to these findings, to improve th
eir review of innovative work. Evaluative criteria that are too narrow
can sometimes lead to the initial rejection of very important papers.