INCREASED AMPLITUDE OF CUTANEOUS REFLEXES DURING HUMAN RUNNING AS COMPARED TO STANDING

Citation
J. Duysens et al., INCREASED AMPLITUDE OF CUTANEOUS REFLEXES DURING HUMAN RUNNING AS COMPARED TO STANDING, Brain research, 613(2), 1993, pp. 230-238
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
00068993
Volume
613
Issue
2
Year of publication
1993
Pages
230 - 238
Database
ISI
SICI code
0006-8993(1993)613:2<230:IAOCRD>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
The amplitude of H-reflexes is decreased during walking as compared to standing and a further reduction is seen during running as compared t o walking. Does a similar reduction occur for reflexes elicited by cut aneous stimulation? To answer this question, the electromyographic (EM G) responses in biceps femoris (BF) and tibialis anterior (TA) to a 20 ms train of 5 electrical pulses, were recorded. This stimulus was app lied to the sural nerve at the ankle, either at 16 different phases of the step cycle in human volunteers running on a treadmill at 8 km/h o r at different isometric contraction levels of TA and BF in the same s ubjects during standing, imitating the postures of different phases of the step cycle. The mean latency of the main responses in BF of all s ubjects was 76 ms. Similar responses (P2), with a latency of 79 ms wer e seen in TA in 6 of the 10 subjects. For a constant strength of stimu lation (2 times perception threshold) during isometric contractions at different levels in early stance imitation, the mean reflex ratio's ( reflex/background) of BF and TA responses were 1.07 and 0.53, respecti vely, while the ratio's for these 2 muscles during running were 1.78 a nd 1.1. The higher reflex ratio's in running were primarily due to the large facilitatory responses, which were present during most of the s tep cycle but rarely during voluntary contractions in the subjects dur ing standing. At the end of the swing phase, however, the responses in BF and TA were predominantly suppressive, as were most of the respons es to stimulation applied to the standing subjects. The difference in reflex amplitudes between running and standing depended on stimulus in tensity. At 1.5 x T (where T = perception threshold) the responses wer e similar for both the standing and run conditions while they were sig nificantly different for pulses at 2.5 x T. The latter difference was due to an increment in the depth of suppression at high stimulus inten sities during standing. It is concluded that running is a task during which there is, in comparison with standing and with the exception of a brief period at end swing, a general enhancement of sural nerve faci litatory reflexes. It is suggested that these reflexes contribute to t he normal activation of muscles such as BF and TA during the step cycl e.