Te. Dawson et Lc. Bliss, PLANTS AS MOSAICS - LEAF-LEVEL, RAMET-LEVEL, AND GENDER-LEVEL VARIATION IN THE PHYSIOLOGY OF THE DWARF WILLOW, SALIX-ARCTICA, Functional ecology, 7(3), 1993, pp. 293-304
1. Plant ecophysiological investigations Often fail to account for age
-specific, tissue- or organ-specific, or life-history-specific effects
on overall performance. To address this issue, aspects of gas exchang
e and water relations of a deciduous and dioecious dwarf willow, Salix
arctica, were examined. The degree of physiological variation that oc
curred as leaves aged was investigated, within and among vegetative an
d reproductive ramets of a plant's canopy, and between the sexes. 2. S
ignificant differences were observed in rates of photosynthetic carbon
assimilation, dark respiration and stomatal conductance, as well as i
n bulk tissue water relations of leaves at different ages, between rep
roductive and vegetative ramets within an individual, and between male
and female individuals. Developing leaves had lower rates of carbon a
ssimilation (A) and stomatal conductance (g), but higher rates of dark
respiration (R(d)), higher levels of total non-structural carbohydrat
es (TNC), higher levels of foliar nitrogen and greater variation in le
af nitrogen concentration. Compared with mature leaves, developing lea
ves also displayed greater variation in osmotic, elastic and turgor pr
operties as well as greater sensitivity to both tissue water deficits
and increased leaf-to-air vapour pressure differences (DELTAw). 3. Rep
roductive ramets, those which produced both leaves and catkins, had si
gnificantly higher A, g and R(d), as well as higher levels of TNC, but
a lower tolerance to both tissue water deficits and increased DELTAw
when compared with vegetative ramets. The enhanced rates of gas exchan
ge in reproductive ramets may have resulted from a greater sink streng
th produced by the presence of catkins. 4. These results suggest that
physiological variation at several different levels of organization ca
n be quite significant. Accounting for such variation is important: (a
) if accurate extrapolations of leaf- or shoot-level performance to wh
ole-plant canopies are to be successful, (b) if an adaptive explanatio
n for variation in physiological properties within a canopy in terms o
f maximizing whole-plant performance is desired, (c) if a detailed und
erstanding of the magnitude of individual-level and population-level v
ariation is desired, and (d) if the goal is to be able to construct a
detailed picture of what contributes to whole-plant performance, or (e
) to characterize accurately a species' ecophysiological breadth withi
n or across environments that are heterogeneous in both time and space
.