Dl. Persons et al., USE OF FLUORESCENT INSITU HYBRIDIZATION FOR DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC-ACID PLOIDY ANALYSIS OF PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA, The Journal of urology, 150(1), 1993, pp. 120-125
Fluorescent in situ hybridization using 2 chromosome specific centrome
re probes was evaluated as a method of ploidy analysis in touch prepar
ations from 50 radical prostatectomy specimens. Tumors were classified
as aneuploid by fluorescent in situ hybridization when nuclei had an
abnormal copy number (aneusomic) for either chromosome centromere 8 or
12. Tetraploid tumors were defined as those with 4 copies (tetrasomic
) of chromosome centromeres 8 and 12. The fluorescent in situ hybridiz
ation ploidy patterns were compared to the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)
ploidy patterns subsequently obtained by flow cytometry on the same t
issue following paraffin embedding. Concordant fluorescent in situ hyb
ridization and flow cytometry ploidy classification was obtained in 82
% of the cases (p less-than-or-equal-to 0.0001). Of 7 aneuploid tumors
3 were identified by both methods. Trisomy 8 was detected by fluoresc
ent in situ hybridization in 3 cases that were classified as DNA diplo
id (2 tumors) and DNA tetraploid (1 tumor). Conversely, flow cytometry
detected aneuploidy (hypotetraploidy) in 1 tumor when the fluorescent
in situ hybridization results were consistent with tetraploidy. Overa
ll, fluorescent in situ hybridization was more sensitive in aneuploidy
detection (6 of 7 cases) than flow cytometry (4 of 7). Of 19 tetraplo
id cases 5 had discordant fluorescent in situ hybridization and flow c
ytometry results. However, all 5 cases contained low levels of tetrapl
oidy and the discrepant results were most likely due to the limits of
precision of 1 or both methods. In conclusion, we demonstrated that fl
uorescent in situ hybridization ploidy analysis can be rapidly perform
ed on fresh touch preparations of prostate tissue. This preliminary st
udy demonstrates that the ploidy result determined by fluorescent in s
itu hybridization correlates well with that obtained by flow cytometry
. More complete fluorescent in situ hybridization studies of prostate
carcinoma will require additional probes for other chromosomes.