Rm. Friedman et al., AN EXPERIMENTAL-MODEL OF NEONATAL TESTICULAR TORSION - EVIDENCE AGAINST AN EXCLUSIVELY EXTRAVAGINAL ETIOLOGY, The Journal of urology, 150(1), 1993, pp. 246-248
The present study was designed to determine whether extravaginal torsi
on of the spermatic cord (EVT) can be distinguished from intravaginal
torsion (IVT) on the basis of gross and histologic examination of the
testis. It is traditionally believed that EVT, postulated to occur onl
y in neonates, can be grossly distinguished from IVT, which occurs in
older patients, on the basis of adherence between testis and tunica va
ginalis. Such adherence is felt to be present in EVT but not IVT. This
concept that the two types of torsion can be distinguished in the ope
rating room has important clinical ramifications. In cases of EVT, con
tralateral orchidopexy theoretically need not be performed, since adhe
sions develop between tunica vaginalis and dartos by a few weeks of ag
e. This is in contrast to IVT, in which contralateral orchidopexy is n
ecessary due to the bilateral nature of the bell clapper deformity. Us
ing a rat model, we first demonstrated that IVT could produce adherenc
e of the tunica vaginalis to testis. Then, eight rats were operated on
, producing right IVT and left EVT. Animals were then sacrificed at in
tervals of up to one month. Gross and histologic examination showed in
volvement of the tunica vaginalis in an ischemic and inflammatory resp
onse in a majority of testes, regardless of the type of torsion. Attem
pts to distinguish EVT from IVT on the basis of grossly evident adhesi
ons between tunica vaginalis and testis are of questionable validity.
Early contralateral orchidopexy is therefore recommended in all cases
of neonatal torsion.