THE VALUE OF PATHOLOGICAL FACTORS IN PREDICTING CANCER-SPECIFIC SURVIVAL AMONG PATIENTS TREATED WITH RADICAL CYSTECTOMY FOR TRANSITIONAL-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE BLADDER AND PROSTATE
Ha. Frazier et al., THE VALUE OF PATHOLOGICAL FACTORS IN PREDICTING CANCER-SPECIFIC SURVIVAL AMONG PATIENTS TREATED WITH RADICAL CYSTECTOMY FOR TRANSITIONAL-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE BLADDER AND PROSTATE, Cancer, 71(12), 1993, pp. 3993-4001
Background. A recent consensus conference on bladder carcinoma highlig
hted the need for pathologic predictors of outcome for patients with t
ransitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. This review was undertaken
to determine the pathologic features predictive of cancer-specific sur
vival after a radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for transitiona
l cell carcinoma of the bladder and prostate. Methods. Between 1969 an
d 1990, 531 patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder a
nd prostate were treated with radical cystectomy at the Duke Universit
y Medical Center. Records and pathologic specimens were analyzed and c
orrelated with outcome. Both univariate and multivariate analyses of t
he pathologic staging were performed to identify variables predictive
of cancer-specific survival. Results. Univariate analysis indicated th
at pathologic tumor (pT) stage, positive nodes, positive surgical marg
ins, prostatic stromal involvement. grade, age, ureteral involvement,
squamous cell carcinoma, and squamous cell differentiation in the spec
imen all were predictive of poor cancer-specific survival. Carcinoma i
n situ (CIS) in the specimen was not an adverse prognostic indicator.
Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the pT stage, nodal involvemen
t, positive surgical margins, patient's age at surgery, and loss of hi
stologic differentiation were predictive of poor cancer-specific survi
val. CIS was found again not to have a negative influence on cancer-sp
ecific survival. Conclusions. If any of these features are noted in th
e final pathologic specimen, patients should be considered for some fo
rm of additional postoperative treatment such as chemotherapy or radia
tion therapy in an attempt to improve their chances for cancer-free su
rvival. These factors will become more important in selecting which pa
tients should be placed in developing adjuvant clinical trials.