L. Kanerva et al., OCCUPATIONAL ALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS CAUSED BY EXPOSURE TO ACRYLATES DURING WORK WITH DENTAL PROSTHESES, Contact dermatitis, 28(5), 1993, pp. 268-275
Between 1974 and 1992, we were consulted by 4 patients (an orthodontis
t, 2 dental technicians and a dental worker trained in-house) who had
developed occupational allergic contact dermatitis from working with d
ental prostheses. All patients had positive allergic patch test reacti
ons to methyl methacrylate (MMA), the acrylate which is the most widel
y used in work with prostheses. All but the orthodontist also reacted
to dimethacrylates, which are used in cross-linked dental prostheses.
The last patient, investigated in 1992, had been exposed mainly to lig
ht-cured acrylics, which are similar in composition to dental composit
e resins. These acrylics, only recently introduced into prosthetic wor
k, contain more potent acrylic sensitizers than MMA. Accordingly, dent
al personnel working with prostheses may face a higher risk of sensiti
zation than previously. To detect cases of occupational allergic conta
ct dermatitis, we suggest that patients working with dental prostheses
should be patch tested with MMA, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, dimetha
crylates, epoxy acrylates and urethane acrylates.